Identity
Candidate verification, liveness and session identity signals can be combined according to program policy.
Trust Center
A clear view of how TrustExam.ai brings identity, device, session and review evidence into one exam integrity workflow.
Evidence architecture
Exam integrity is strongest when multiple signals are reviewed together instead of treating one alert as proof.
Candidate verification, liveness and session identity signals can be combined according to program policy.
Workstation, virtual-machine and connected-device evidence helps teams investigate technical risk.
Webcam, screen and optional additional camera sources create a fuller record of the assessment.
Flags support human review. Decisions, exceptions and appeals remain part of the institution's workflow.
Operating principles
Technology provides evidence. Policy, legal review and accountable human decisions remain with the organization running the assessment.
Automated signals should support reviewers, not silently make high-stakes decisions.
Retention, storage and access requirements are agreed for each deployment.
Events and review outcomes can be organized into an audit-ready case record.
Programs can plan for remote, testing-center and lower-bandwidth conditions.
Program evidence
The figures below describe TrustExam.ai program history and the ongoing Kazakhstan driver-testing case. They are not universal performance guarantees.
≈7M
Approximate total supplied by the TrustExam.ai team.
Oct 2023 → today
A continuing Kazakhstan exam integrity program.
Read the case study ↗Trust FAQ
No. TrustExam.ai surfaces evidence and risk signals. The organization defines policy and remains responsible for final decisions and appeals.
Yes. Hosting, storage, integrations, retention and operational controls should be agreed during solution design and contractual review.
TrustExam.ai can work with LMS platforms, custom portals, APIs and webhooks. The exact scope is confirmed during technical discovery.
Yes. Contact the team with your security, privacy and procurement checklist so the relevant materials can be reviewed in context.
Next step
Send the team your checklist and deployment context. We will identify which answers are available now and which require technical or legal review.
Request a security review ↗