Professional certification
Give a certification body the materials needed to assess exam integrity separately from competence. Define the reviewer’s authority and the escalation path for disputed events.
Azerbaijan
Exam integrity for organisations in Azerbaijan
Design a reviewable process for qualification, university and public-sector assessments. Connect identity checks and session records with clear responsibilities for decisions and appeals.
WORKFLOWS TO EXPLORE
A defensible review begins with agreed rules.
University examinations
Match the monitoring configuration to the assessment format: closed book, approved references or practical work. Tell students which tools and behaviours are permitted.
Public-sector programmes
For a proposed public-sector deployment, map the responsibilities of the programme owner, delivery sites and reviewers before the procurement discussion.
BEFORE ROLLOUT
What to validate for your programme
Bring these questions into discovery and the acceptance criteria.
Azerbaijani candidate guidance
Include Azerbaijani text and the programme’s other languages in acceptance testing. Verify names, diacritics, instructions and the clarity of incident messages.
Evidence access
Specify who may open recordings, annotate a session and make a final finding. Agree how evidence is shared for a review without expanding access unnecessarily.
An appeal record
Record the applicable rule, event time, relevant evidence and reviewer rationale. A risk score can help prioritise review but cannot substitute for that explanation.
A PRACTICAL FIRST STEP
A pilot with clear decision criteria
Use a representative exam and two reviewers to compare interpretations of the same sample of sessions. Resolve differences in the review rules before increasing the number of participants.
Read the pilot evaluation guideWhat to compare
- Readiness
- Successful setup checks and completed sessions.
- Signal quality
- Useful events, false signals and missed situations.
- Reviewer workflow
- Review time, agreement and reasons for disagreement.
- Participant journey
- Clear instructions, support requests and accommodations.
FAQ
Answers before your next step
Explore the details before your demo. If your question is not here, talk it through with our team.
Talk to the teamDoes a high risk score invalidate an exam?
No. An authorised person reviews the available evidence under the organiser’s rules. TrustScore and automated events are inputs to that review.
Is TrustExam an examination authority?
TrustExam provides exam-integrity technology. The institution or programme owner sets eligibility, assessment and appeal rules and makes the final decision.
Do we need a separate exam platform?
TrustExam can provide the question bank, exam settings, participant groups, invitations and results. If your organisation already uses an assessment system, discuss an integration instead. The programme language, devices and data exchange must be checked for the selected setup.
Explore the relevant solutions
All regionsPREPARE A USEFUL DEMO
Start with your assessment
Share the country, languages, exam format, concurrent sessions and your current platform. Together we can define what a meaningful pilot needs to test.
Request a demonstration