Education and training teams
Discuss the connection to your existing LMS, including participant access and assessment results. Confirm the supported workflow for your version.
INTEGRATIONS
Keep your assessment platform. Connect the integrity workflow.
Connect TrustExam to your learning or assessment service. For universities, training teams and EdTech or LMS providers, start with the participant journey, data ownership and the review workflow you need to support.
A PRACTICAL APPROACH
A clear boundary between systems.
There are two delivery paths. Use TrustExam’s question bank, exam settings, participant groups and results as your assessment platform, or keep your existing system and integrate proctoring. For an integration, agree where participants enter, how sessions are linked and what results return to each system.
EdTech & LMS providers
Map how assessment or proctoring fits into your product. Define system boundaries, actual interfaces and the responsibilities of both support teams.
Exam-platform owners
Retain the agreed exam workflow while connecting identity, session controls or review where the integration supports them.
DETAILS & NEXT STEPS
Define the boundary between the two systems.
01
Learning and exam ownership
Decide whether questions and assessment stay in your platform or run in TrustExam. Assign the owners of learner records, marking and session review.
02
Identity and launch
Map participants, exams and attempts using stable identifiers. Agree authentication, launch permissions and what happens after an interrupted or duplicate launch.
03
Results and review
Define answer scores, session statuses and integrity decisions separately. Confirm which fields can be exchanged and who may access recordings and other evidence.
04
Versions and support
Validate the actual documentation and supported versions. Agree responsibilities for release changes, participant support and problems crossing system boundaries.
FROM SETUP TO ACCEPTANCE
Validate one complete integration path.
Agree the expected outcome, then verify it in a representative workflow for your organisation.
What the setup should deliver
Workflow map
Agreed systems, roles, identifiers and data ownership.
Confirmed exchange
The actual launch and result fields supported by the agreed integration.
Support responsibilities
Named owners for participant problems and technical escalation.
What to verify in the pilot
- 01
Launch the correct exam
Verify the participant, assignment and attempt identifiers.
- 02
Handle abnormal paths
Test an interrupted session and duplicate launch under the agreed rules.
- 03
Confirm result meanings
Check that both systems distinguish scores, statuses and integrity outcomes.
- 04
Complete reviewer access
Validate authorised evidence access and the support handover.
FAQ
Answers before your next step
Explore the details before your demo. If your question is not here, talk it through with our team.
Talk to the teamIs this relevant to EdTech and LMS providers?
Yes, this is the right conversation for platform teams that want to add an assessment or proctoring workflow to their existing service. The scope, interfaces and support model must be validated together.
Does an SDK mean every LMS works out of the box?
No. Compatibility depends on the actual platform, version and intended workflow. Confirm the interfaces and test the complete participant and reviewer journeys.
Can you confirm API endpoints, SSO or LTI support here?
Specific endpoints, authentication methods, protocols and supported versions must come from current technical documentation. They should not be inferred from a general integration illustration.
Practical guides
YOUR PROGRAMME. YOUR NEXT STEP.
Bring your platform team into the discussion.
Share the existing workflow and technical documentation so we can confirm the integration scope.
Book a demo